Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type"

To: "Richards" <jruing@ameritech.net>, "Michael Baker" <k7ddmjb@qwest.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type"
From: <atrampler@att.net>
Reply-to: atrampler@att.net
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:01:35 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
At that point a rigid vertical dipole, perhaps 80' high, also might make a 
lot of sense to build.  There's a Chinese unit rated at 400w continuous, but 
that's as much as I've seen in a SMALL weatherized package (unlike that 
Swiss-made unit).

73
Art, K0RO


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richards" <jruing@ameritech.net>
To: "Michael Baker" <k7ddmjb@qwest.net>
Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type"


> Yes - I would buy one immediately and install it on my vertical.
>
>         (Marketing gurus pay attention!)
>
> ==================  Richards - K8JHR  ================
>
> Michael Baker wrote:
>
>  > I just wish someone made a full gallon rated, self contained and
> powered,
>> automatic remotely operated antenna tuner.
>
> =================================================
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>