| To: | Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Compacted vs. Undisturbed Soil |
| From: | Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:52:50 -0500 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Dick Flanagan wrote: > My friend is being told that properly compacted back-fill is the > equivalent of undisturbed soil. Is that true?? That sounds like something I'd want the PE who put his name on plan to answer. Tim, N9PUZ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] lightning protection/power quality forum splits, Rick O'Keefe, TC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Compacted vs. Undisturbed Soil, David Gilbert |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Compacted vs. Undisturbed Soil, Dick Flanagan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Compacted vs. Undisturbed Soil, Mike |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |