Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] R25G vs. large antenna

To: K7LXC@aol.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] R25G vs. large antenna
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Reply-to: n4zr@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:18:11 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Yes, but as K7NV has pointed out from time to time on Towertalk, antenna 
manufacturers vary in their practices with respect to how they define 
their wind area numbers - and you need to be sure they are 
"apples-to-apples" with the Rohn data.

73, Pete N4ZR
New Articles Daily - the Contesting Compendium at http://wiki.contesting.com
The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net


On 8/18/2009 9:31 PM, K7LXC@aol.com wrote:
> Howdy, TowerTalkians --
>
>      This thread contained lots of anecdotal information  and I found it
> surprising that NO ONE mentioned what the tower spec from the  manufacturer 
> is.
>
>      Sixty feet of 25G (I think that was the height of  interest) is rated
> for 16.9 square feet @ 70 MPH, 10.2 sq.ft. @ 90 MPH and 8.2  sq.ft. @ 110
> MPH. In any case it looks like you're covered.
>
>      In the future, _www.rohnnet.com_ (http://www.rohnnet.com)  has an
> online catalog with  these specs. And as always, follow the LXC Prime 
> Directive
> to "DO what the  manufacturer says."
>
> Cheers,
> Steve    K7LXC
> TOWER TECH
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>    
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>