Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipoles

Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipoles
From: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:20:46 +0000
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Jerry,

I apologise - I misunderstood which set of dimensions you had a problem 
with.
For what it's worth, the N6LF QEX dimensions model OK, John's 80m 
dimensions model OK, but I can't get close with his 160m dimensions.

73,
Steve G3TXQ

K4SAV wrote:

 

> I read all those references before I commented, hoping to find a reason 
> for the error.  I am looking at the 160 meter version (not the 80 meter 
> version), and as you described the top wire is 130 ft tip to tip (two 
> wires end to end each 65 ft is the same thing).  The bottom wire is also 
> 130 ft tip to tip (or two wires end to end each 65 ft), 10 ft above 
> ground, and the vertical wire is 45 ft.  It appears that EZNEC doesn't 
> agree with the description on that page.  I can only speculate on the 
> reason for the difference.
>
> Jerry, K4SAV
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>