Jerry,
I apologise - I misunderstood which set of dimensions you had a problem
with.
For what it's worth, the N6LF QEX dimensions model OK, John's 80m
dimensions model OK, but I can't get close with his 160m dimensions.
73,
Steve G3TXQ
K4SAV wrote:
> I read all those references before I commented, hoping to find a reason
> for the error. I am looking at the 160 meter version (not the 80 meter
> version), and as you described the top wire is 130 ft tip to tip (two
> wires end to end each 65 ft is the same thing). The bottom wire is also
> 130 ft tip to tip (or two wires end to end each 65 ft), 10 ft above
> ground, and the vertical wire is 45 ft. It appears that EZNEC doesn't
> agree with the description on that page. I can only speculate on the
> reason for the difference.
>
> Jerry, K4SAV
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|