| To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:23:00 -0700 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On 7/23/2013 9:47 PM, K8RI wrote: but is there such an animal that will cover 160 reliably on QRO? Here's another approach, that you, as an engineer, might appreciate. http://audiosystemsgroup.com/PacificonSmithChart.pdf I replaced a lot of Ten Tec antenna tuners with coax and relay switching. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Tower grounding, Joe Giacobello, K2XX |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Tower Grounding, Joe Barnes |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants, K8RI |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants, K8RI |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |