To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants |
From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
Date: | Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:40:14 -0700 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On 7/24/2013 8:34 PM, Gene Fuller wrote: I don't understand the problem with copperweld. How much stress is on them? My antennas, and Glen's antennas, are flat top dipoles, up 100 - 120 ft between very tall trees that sway a lot in the wind, fed with 150 ft or so of RG11, with 100# counterweights. That's a LOT more than the stress on a sloper, or an inverted Vee. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants, Gene Fuller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants, K8RI |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants, Gene Fuller |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants, K8RI |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |