Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions
From: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Reply-to: herbs@vitelcom.net
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 17:42:28 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
If I can rephrase Richard's remark that says "Amp that can't handle that has no place in my shack." or Amp that has tubes without handles has no place in my shack. ☺

Herb, KV4FZ





On 10/26/2013 4:05 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:34 PM, Richard Solomon wrote:
That just shows the failings of SS Amps. A 1.3:1 SWR equates to 1.7%
reflected power. Any
Amp that can't handle that has no place in my shack.

As for tube amps, just shows the benefits of a tuneable Pi-Network.

My neighbor K6XX, the engineer at Elecraft who put the KPA500 into production and has done extensive testing of many competing amplifiers, observes that the IMD produced by a solid state power amplifier rises rapidly with a mismatched load, and also when operating too close to its limits. To prevent this, the firmware in the KPA500 limits power output, and also causes it to fold back with SWR around 2:1. Both of us run tube amps for contesting.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>