Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Poor eHam reviews of the AV 480

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Poor eHam reviews of the AV 480
From: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 04:57:05 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 4/9/2014 8:19 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

How do we over ride the poor reviews from hams who probably have no
idea of how to set up a vertical?

With only three reviews, the AV-680 suffers because of one bad review
for an issue (MFJ/Hy-Gain quality control) that has no bearing on the
antenna's performance.

I'd suggest looking at the reviews for the AV-640, AV-620, CushCraft
R9, R8, R7, R5, R6000 and R7000 all of which are essentially the same

The R series us a similar matching scheme. I have an R8, but they also use traps for some bands while the AV series do not. I had a devil of a time matching the R series while the AV was cook book easy.

73

Roger (K8RI)



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>