On 5/18/2014 12:44 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
On 5/17/14, 9:13 PM, Roger (K8RI) on TT wrote:
On 5/17/2014 11:27 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
On 5/17/14, 6:11 PM, Drax Felton wrote:
What is the conductance per inch of concrete in mho's ?
http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/concrete.html
10-50 mS/m
Shouldn't the medium be in cubic units?
No.. it works out right if you do the dimensional analysis..
Not if you do the math right.
Resistivity is in ohm-m, conductivity in 1/(ohm-m) or S/m (since S is
1/ohms)
Resistivity is not ohms per m, it's usually given as ohms per cubic
centimeter.
Resistance usually is dimensionless, unless it's bulk and then it's so
many ohms per unit length
You are confusing resistance with resistivity. You are losing a unit
somewhere because resistivity is ohms per cubic meter or more often ohms
per cubic centimeter. Look up the dictionary definition. Resistance is
between two points. Resistivity takes into account the volume as the
units are .
Resistivity is in ohms per cubic centimeter. I worked with developing
standards for liquids and circular solids With a Silicon production
company for many years.
The dictionary definition: for resistivity takes into account both
area and length. IE: volume as in resistivity ohms ^3 cm. Had a devil
of a time getting the techs to stop confusing the two. The easiest was
to give them a probe consisting of 2, 1cm square plates, 1 cm apart,
then thy had no conversions.
Resistance = Length * resistivity/cross sectional area.
No. Again that is resistivity
so to get ohms as resistance, you need resistivity to be ohms * length
(because Length/area is 1/length)
Likewise, conductivity is = Area * conductivity/length, so it needs to
be Siemens/meter
Conductivity is the reciprocal of resistivity, not resistance. Please
stop working the formulas and just look up the definitions
73
Roger (K8RI)
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|