Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Common-mode choke

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Common-mode choke
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 23:35:19 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 5/19/2014 2:08 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
I would guess that most antenna applications are more the "broadband choke" than the "narrowband notch".

In ALL cases where ferrite chokes are used for suppression, it is the resistive component of the impedance that is always useful. A choke that depends only on inductive reactance will resonate with the cable that it is choking, which increases the current rather than suppressing it.

The RFI-Ham.pdf tutorial shows the only trustworthy measurement setup I know of other than the dedicated HP Impedance instrument. Both that tutorial, and the Power Point pdf on Coax Chokes show several chokes with their measurements, then computes circuit values for their parallel equivalent circuits.

Note that my measurements are scalar (magnitude only), so those circuit values are developed by empirical means. Rp is the Z at resonance, a first approximation for L is determined from the shape of the curve well below resonance, C is computed from the resonance equation. Then L and C values are tweaked manually until the plot of the resonance equation most closely matches the measured data.

Also note that because the equivalent circuit for #31 chokes with lots of turns includes two resonance, stagger-tuned, the above method must be considered a first approximation. See the tutorial for a discussion of the second resonance.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>