So very true. In fact, I've always felt that at least part of the
reason that MFJ ended up with those companies that K1QX thinks MFJ
"saved" was because they couldn't compete with decent products against
the inferior ones that MFJ put out at lower prices. Anyone seriously
think that MFJ's products were better quality than the pre-MFJ ones from
those other companies?
Again, MFJ has been successful because they serve the market as it
exists in general ... one that overall is not very discerning and which
values price over all else.
73,
Dave AB7E
On 9/1/2014 11:05 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
As someone who has made a living in technical sales, I see another
negative to their operation -- they pollute the market for products of
moderate cost but better quality. That makes it that much more
difficult for a company to enter the market with a competing product,
when what APPEARS to be an equivalent is heavily advertised at a much
lower cost.
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|