To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: FW: Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? |
From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
Date: | Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:54:30 -0800 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On Wed,12/17/2014 9:50 AM, Jim Brown wrote: I've measured the traps for both of these antennas with a Vector Network Analyzer, and they are NOT functioning as traps -- their stray C is small enough that they resonate FAR above the bands they cover. I've also plugged the loading coils into NEC and confirmed the design. Correction -- "I've measured the loading coils" 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: FW: Adding 160 to an 80M dipole?, Jim Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole?, RLVZ--- via TowerTalk |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: FW: Adding 160 to an 80M dipole?, Jim Brown |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: FW: Adding 160 to an 80M dipole?, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |