Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: RF Ground is a Myth

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: RF Ground is a Myth
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 06:15:19 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 1/21/15 5:29 AM, Patrick Greenlee wrote:
I have a triangular tower with legs on 14 ft centers, yes, 14 feet, not
inches.  I built it with three separate concrete foundations, one per
leg.  It is currently tilted over so one leg is not touching its
concrete embedded mechanical connection/mount.



Am I missing something?  Will a simple ohm meter test give a reasonable
measure of Ufer ground quality, sufficient to decide the question of
whether or not multiple copper clad ground rods need to be installed and
interconnected?

You need to use an AC source for the measurement: a DC source will cause polarization and the reading will be low resistance at first and then rise (think as if it were an electrolytic capacitor). The other thing is that a typical solid state multimeter uses such low current/voltage that you're going to see strange readings.

if you have something like a 12-24V AC transformer around (12.6V filament transformer, landscape lighting, bell transformer), you can use it: measure voltage and current, and you can go from there. You can even use 110V (with an isolation transformer from the line, please!)





Is it too much of a leap of faith or otherwise to assume the inter-leg
resistance is an adequate predictor of tower mount to Mother Earth
conductivity?


Nope.. that's pretty much how they do it.

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>