Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Cable Clamps

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Cable Clamps
From: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 14:12:19 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I wonder if a workable clamp could be found that mechanically starts out OK and only goes bad over time as the cheap thin coating corrodes so that maybe we could find some sort of coating that would preserve the fitting in an outdoor environment or maybe if really lucky in a marine or near marine environment. What passes for galvanizing these days is often a thin zinc plating that gets dinged up when worked with tools but will corrode quickly even when in like new condition. Unfortunately, like new, means so little.

Patrick   NJ5G


On 6/7/2015 2:56 PM, Donald Chester wrote:
It's tower and antenna season once again.

For tower guying I prefer Big Grips, but for some applications I still use old 
fashioned cable clamps, for example, to attach guy wires to ground anchors, 
allowing for easy re-adjustment as necessary, months or even years after the 
initial installation.  Another is for strain insulators and other hardware 
whose contour won't allow it to fit snugly against the U-shaped bend of the Big 
Grip. An engineer at PLP verified that this has caused failure, particularly 
with offshore manufactured strain insulators. He strongly recommended against 
using Big Grips for such applications, knowingly discouraging potential sales.

For a recent project I ordered a bag of 3/16" clamps from Rohn through one of their distributors, 
under the same part number as listed in the Rohn catalogue. Originally, these were part # 3/16 CCM, but 
the Rohn catalogue now lists them as 3/16 CCF.  The old style were "malleable", while the new 
style are said to be "forged".  I have found the newer style to be all but worthless.  One 
would be better off buying cheap wire rope clips from Ace Hardware.

The older CCM clamps had a deep channel in the body of the saddle, which 
positioned the dead end to overlay the live cable under pressure from the 
U-bolt, so that all compression was exerted between the two sections of cable. 
Instead of a real channel, the newer CCF clamps have four bumps on the body of 
the saddle, laid out in a rectangular configuration. The channel formed between 
the bumps is too shallow to hold both segments of cable in place so that one 
rides on top of the other; the dead end tends to ride over to one side at about 
a 45 degree angle, wedging partly against the body of the saddle instead of 
pressing 100% against the live cable. In addition, the older clamps had a 
series of diagonal grooves at the bottom of the channel, designed to grip the 
cable over the full length of the channel.  The newer ones have a single 
diagonal ridge, which pinches the live cable in exactly the same manner as the 
U-bolt does when clamps are installed the wrong way and the U-bolt
 b
  ears down on the live cable. I did a test run with some newer clamps, a piece 
of scrap cable and a come-along. I was able to pull the cable tightly enough to 
cause it to slip through three clamps with the nuts firmly tightened. I suspect 
this would have been impossible with the older clamps; some piece of hardware 
would fail or the cable would break before it would slip through the clamps.

Furthermore, the U-bolts that come with these clamps are no better than the 
saddles.  The older ones were heavily galvanised, like marine hardware. The 
newer ones are merely zinc-plated, just like the aforementioned Ace Hardware 
product. About six months ago I used some of the newer clamps for a less 
critical application, to attach some pieces of guy cable anchoring the end 
insulators of a wire antenna. Now, in little more than half a year, the U-bolt 
nuts are completely rusted with no remaining sign of zinc plating at all; in 
fact the nuts on these clamps are already rustier than the older ones on a 
nearby tower that has been up for more than 30 years.

I called this to the attention of a Rohn engineer, and his only comment was that Rohn 
"no longer supports"  the use of cable clamps with guy wires; they now solely 
recommend Big Grips. He said they only list clamps in the catalogue because they still 
occasionally get orders for them. The illustration in the catalogue clearly shows a 
picture of the older style clamps, not the junk they sell now.

Does anyone know of a vendor who stocks original style heavily galvanised 
clamps similar or identical to the older 3/16CCM? Based on what I paid in 1980 
and on-line inflation calculators, these should now run a little over $1.00 
apiece.

Don k4kyv
                                        
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>