I would be careful adding extra braces. Much of the brace strength
comes from the angles between the brace and legs. Using lesser angles
reduces the strength, requiring still more braces. OTOH. I doubt the
extra braces would cause the tower to collapse under its own weight.
The braces serve to keep the tower legs parallel, which adds a lot of
strength in the lateral plane (resistance to bending in the wind) It
adds little to the ability support a load. IE: dead weight. They also
keep the tower from bending when "tipped up" in one piece. I believe
"X" braces bolted, or welded together where they cross will add strength.
This tower is only going to be about 40 to 50 feet tall and will support
a small beam/tri-bander. I have my doubts about the wind load and
leverage from a mast supporting a 5L 6-meter Yagi and a small 40 meter
beam at the required spacing. I'd be more inclined to use a series of
sloping dipoles on 40 and limit the wind load to a single, small tribander.
I'm assuming that the limitations are materials and budget as they are
for most hams and suitable used towers are not available. That adds
another dimension to the requirements: Durability. To me, it sounds as
if failure of the tower is not an option. Here in the states, we have
the options of used towers and lots of suitable materials to build and
rebuild towers. This does not appear to be such a case. If budget is
the problem, then I'd go conservative on the antennas.
73
Roger (K8RI)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|