Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking question

To: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking question
From: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 14:13:54 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I am saying that HFTA is not a good tool for modeling stacking distances.
I also disagree with your max distance stacking numbers.

Sent from my Smartphone.

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist <
richard@karlquist.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 8/9/2016 7:03 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
>
>> I have no HFTA experience however after looking at the stacking distances
>> from people that have used it I would not recommend it. It puts the beams
>> way too close together in my opinion.
>>
>> John KK9A
>>
>> high for you! I've stuck with the M2 recommendations - and have in
>> modeling confirmed they work well. That is 60' on 20 and 45' on 15. The
>>
>> Gary
>> K9RX
>>
>>
> According to my modelling, 60' on 20 and 45' on 15 are near the
> MAXIMUM stacking distances, being nearly a wavelength.  Did I
> misunderstand what you were saying?
>
> Rick N6RK
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>