Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Check that tape !

To: RCM <robrk@nidhog.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Check that tape !
From: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 20:31:56 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Re constant on voltages in remote boxes:

I found the innards of my DX Eng 4 sq receive boxes a bit of a mess around the soldered on F connectors. One 4 sq had problems in the switch box but the antenna boxes were ok and the another 4sq bought used just the reverse. The problem was a collection of white/tan crud around and shorting the soldered on F connectors. It isn't possible to measure the resistance of the crud since the RG6 cables are transformer driven. However, they didn't look good and others on the reflector commented that the strong intermittent noise (S9+20) problem I was having can be caused by 10k ohm shorts. The crud source I am pretty sure was inadequate cleaning of the PCB residual solder flux and the essentially constant application of 12v DC on the RG6 cables in the presence of moisture. The antenna is in a very wet part of my lot and it does rain a bit here in the Pacific NW. I aggressively brushed and flux remover cleaned off this crud and defluxed the entire board. Then I applied two coats of acrylic conformal coating on each connector etch pattern (4 mounting studs and center pin) on the solder side. I couldn't brush under the connector bodies so used the wand sprayer to clean the component side and could not apply acrylic there either.

This antenna is a bear to diagnose problems, particularly intermittent noise. Plus no schematics from DXE, but I did find the W8JI patent and think it is approximates the actual circuits. As predicted by DXE support, the most significant noise cause was a connector damaged by the lawn guys and cosmetically repaired by them, but I think it does perform better after the crud removal.

My advice is to thoroughly clean all residual flux off PCB's and connectors going into remote anythings and to conformal coat them after the cleaning. Also, turn off the power when not in use.

Remember that small galvanic voltages and thus currents cause propellers to fail and bolted keels to fall off sailboats. Hence sacrificial zincs are placed and replaced regularly. IMO, the only desirable voltage is one that protects the critical components from galvanic corrosion, but I don't know how that might be appropriate in amateur radio antenna systems.

Grant KZ1W

On 2/23/2017 16:48 PM, RCM wrote:


I also read rumours last year from a Belgian or German guy who was wondering
about DC always being on a coax line and his corrosion that ensued.  This
intrigues me as up until today I have had that RCS-4 coax switch on pretty
much 24/7-365 for years and years, only turning it off if I am on vacation.
A little voice inside my electronics head has to wonder if a small DC
current on that coax for many years has contributed to my 'current' mess.
(no pun intended)



I was led to believe a little current flow kept corrosion away.

Messing in the two way radio game for lots of years and dancing with telephone 
companies over leased control lines to
remote base stations, we specified “sealing current”. Since there was no “talk battery” 
voltage or “ring voltage” to keep the
connections clean.

The base stations were low level tone control and just audio up and back. No 
volts.

If the phone guys swapped pairs to fix something and didn’t look at the original order 
to put the current on the line, it wasn’t
long before it quit working.

I’ve fixed a few, just having them put the juice back on the pair.

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>