Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Wire antenna help needed

To: "'RCM'" <robrk@nidhog.net>, "'Joe Subich, W4TV'" <lists@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Wire antenna help needed
From: "Mike & Becca Krzystyniak" <k9mk@flash.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:25:45 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
The bulk of my 160M DXCC QSO's used an OCFD (270' E2E fed about 90' from one 
end). 
With winds and heavy icing, it never fell down.
It worked quite well on 80M too.

YMMV especially if the materials lack a robustness for the environment.

K9MK


-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of RCM
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 3:05 PM
To: Joe Subich, W4TV
Cc: towertalk reflector
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Wire antenna help needed


> On Mar 22, 2017, at 13:49, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@subich.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I would not recommend the Carolina Windom as I had one literally fall 
> apart due to UV degradation of the PVC DMU (feedpoint) housing here in 
> Florida.
> 

To say a Carolina Windom is no good because yours fell down, is saying Ford 
cars are no good because I had a flat tire.

I think the term “Carolina Windom” was given as a cute name in some magazine 
article, describing someones version of an off center fed dipole.

Made from junk, they fall down. 

I have never tried one, so I can’t comment on performance.

You can make a bad antenna (performing)  from good components.
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>