Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160 vertical question (Top Hat)

To: "'towertalk reflector'" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160 vertical question (Top Hat)
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:15:09 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
>"Another technique that is often used for matching is to make the wires much 
>longer than resonant (that is, resonant around the top of the BC band), so 
>that the feed point Z is 50 +jX ohms (that is, inductive) on 160M, and tune 
>the capacitance out by adding a capacitor of equal value in series.    NEC can 
>easily model this."

When over-resonating with a long T-top on 160m, the maximum current point moves 
away from the ground and up toward the center of the vertical radiator -- 
another benefit.   Unless there's a deliberate need to resonate on the 
operating frequency (e.g., with some phased arrays), then over-resonating a 
single T-top vertical radiator should be the objective, subject to the 
availability of long, tall supports on either side of the vertical section.

As the resistive component of base Z increases, matching network losses are 
minimized, especially if the T is tuned to 50+jX as K9YC cites.  Then, network 
loss is a function of C, the only matching component needed.  Make it a vacuum 
type, and matching loss is very low.

When the T-top is resonated into the BC band, be prepared for some very high 
base voltages if it's located anywhere near a BC station at the top of the BC 
band.   The better CIA and VNA devices can be operated in these conditions and 
still provide valid measurements.

Paul, W9AC 


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>