Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipole other choices?

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipole other choices?
From: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:02:42 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

Dielectric loading works as well in theory, but is obviously more difficult in practice.  For grins one day I modeled an 80m vertical (fed against a couple of radials) with the vertical portion being 3 inch diameter PVC with a wire running down the center of it.  By pumping DI water (relative dielectric constant about 3.0 if I remember correctly) in from the base of the tube I could shift the resonant point over 100 KHz, thereby making it somewhat tunable.  I shudder to think what it would take mechanically to support it, of course, unless I strapped it to the side of my tower with all the attendant coupling effects of doing so.

I think people have tried similar things using salt water, except without the wire.  I think I even tried modeling that once but found the conductive loss was too high ... don't remember for sure.

73,
Dave   AB7E




On 10/20/2020 1:41 PM, jimlux wrote:


There are tons of ways to do this - most antenna designs are driven by mechanical constraints not electrical ones.  Just look at all the schemes for loading horizontal dipoles and yagis.

There are people who have built antennas out of conductive liquids.



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>