| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipole other choices? |
| From: | <john@kk9a.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:42:23 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
I have never modeled or used a Force 12 Sigma (T bar) vertical but to me it seems like a great idea. I am not sure why this product line was dropped. http://www.kg4jjh.com/pdf/sigma-40xk%20review.pdf I have used a similar design, a C shaped wire vertical dipole which uses L loading for each leg. I used this in March on 160m from Aruba and it worked very well. John KK9A jimlux wrote: You can also do top hats/T-bars like the Force 12 vertical dipoles _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipole other choices?, Tom Osborne Sr. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipole other choices?, jimlux |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipole other choices?, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipole other choices?, Rob Atkinson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |