Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] SP7GXP antennas?

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] SP7GXP antennas?
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 22:46:31 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Frankly I'm wondering more about the physdcal durability of the antennas, if they weigh (as some have said) only about 2/3 as much as the equivalent product from JK or Opti-beam.  Thinner-walled tubing?

Anyway, that's why I asked about the RHR Maine site.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network
web server at<http://beta.reversebeacon.net>.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.

On 10/21/2021 8:43 PM, Lux, Jim wrote:
On 10/21/21 2:20 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
I would like to put up an isotropic antenna and compare it to my Yagis.

Yes, you could power your measurement system with a perpetual motion machine as well.


The Hairy Ball Theorem says that building an isotropic antenna is impossible. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hairy_ball_theorem )

Hence, you build a standard gain antenna, the gain of which is calculate-able from dimensions and materials.

A dipole is easy, and fairly straightforward to calculate the gain (including ohmic losses).  As is a "short dipole".

Or, you build 3 antennas and do a three cornered hat.

The antenna range literature is full of practical solutions.


Free space gain measurements of large antennas is difficult.  I have seen some herculean efforts toward that end (promulgated by people who should know better).




_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>