To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Collapse in South Dakota |
From: | <sawyered@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Sat, 21 Jan 2023 12:27:18 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
The point wasn't about saying that tall commercial towers are built like most ham towers or that they should be. There was a statement made that the "lay down" failure of this tower is a reason why municipalities require the tower be set back on property lines more than the height of the tower (referring to ham towers). My point was that most ham towers wouldn't fail that way. Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Collapse in South Dakota, Rob Atkinson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Collapse in South Dakota, David Gilbert |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Collapse in South Dakota, Steve Maki |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Collapse in South Dakota, David Gilbert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |