VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] captive rovers

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] captive rovers
From: jim@forsyth.net (Jim Forsyth)
Date: Tue Jul 29 16:10:36 2003
I'm inclined to think that perhaps you do not understand the issue. The
example you created could of been based on increasing your power, getting
better antennas, more bands, more modes, better location, better coax,
better preamps. Would you then be suggesting that those things are bad?
Captive rovers is just one more thing that could be done to be more
competitive.

Jim, AF6O

----- Original Message -----
From: "George Fremin III" <geoiii@kkn.net>
To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 12:58 PM
Subject: [VHFcontesting] captive rovers


>
> Based on some of the comments I have seen posted on this subject
> recently (and in the past) it is clear to me that many do not
> understand the issue of captive rovers.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>