To: | "T. M." <k7xc@charter.net>,VHF Contesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - A New Category Is Needed |
From: | Dan K9ZF <n9rla@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:55:05 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
I agree Tim. A separate class would be simple, and effective. The best solution. I personally think it is likely against the "spirit of the rules", but with their own separate category I don't see any reason to limit some one else's fun. Give them their own category, and let them do their thing. Everyone wins. 73 Dan -- K9ZF /R no budget Rover ***QRP-l #1269 Check out the Rover Resource Page at: <http://www.qsl.net/n9rla> List Administrator for: InHam+grid-loc+ham-books _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - A New Category Is Needed, T. M. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - A New Category Is Needed, ADUHAWK |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - A New Category Is Needed, T. M. |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - A New Category Is Needed, Mike (KA5CVH) Urich |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |