On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:50:48AM -0500, John D'Ausilio wrote:
> Any idea *who* to email?
>
contests@arrl.org
>From the ARRL web page:
http://www.arrl.org/contests/
For Contest information, you can contact us at contests@arrl.org or by phone at
860-594-0232
>
> On 12/21/06, George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net> wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 09:21:16AM -0500, steve kavanagh wrote:
> >> I'm glad to see this. I do believe that if a
> >> computerized process is used to remove QSOs from logs,
> >> the results really should be justified and the rules
> >> by which the corrected score is determined should be
> >> transparent. Alas, not being a member (seeing as the
> >> ARRL does not represent me to my gov't, etc.) it seems
> >> I won't be able to see my own report.
> >
> >You sould be able to get a copy by emailing the ARRL
> >and asking for it.
> >
> >>
> >> In K5TR's report there are 11 dupes, 4 incorrect
> >> exchanges and one "not in log" for a total of 16 QSOs
> >> that should not count (or 17 including penalty QSOs),
> >> but the difference between raw and net QSOs is only
> >> 13.
> >
> >I am not sure - and I do not seem to have enough
> >information with me on this computer to tell much.
> >
> >I will take a look at this later and report back.
> >
> >
> >> Can someone explain these apparent discrepancies to me
> >
> >My pas experiance with LCR reports is that they often
> >make sense when explained but that sometimes the
> >text in them is less than clear. If I am making any
> >sense myself.
> >
> >
> >--
> >George Fremin III - K5TR
> >geoiii@kkn.net
> >http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >VHFcontesting mailing list
> >VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >
--
George Fremin III - K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|