VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] using non-amateur means for skeds duringcontests

To: Dan Evans <dan.evans@insightbb.com>, jcplatt1@mmm.com,VHF Contesting eMail Remailer <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] using non-amateur means for skeds duringcontests
From: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:28:46 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Why not eliminate all potential for cheating by
changing the rule to allow non-amateur means for skeds
in VHF contests? People at the contest branch have
better things to do than monitor Ping Jockey to catch
Joe Blow. Besides, what's the difference between using
the telephone before the contest and using the
telephone during the contest to arrange a sked if the
object is to complete a QSO via radio? None.

K7CW

--- Dan Evans <dan.evans@insightbb.com> wrote:

> Seems to me it would be a pretty simple thing for
> someone at the contest 
> branch to record ping jockey, or other dx lists, for
> the weekend.  And 
> then cross check against submitted contest logs to
> look for rules 
> violations.
> 
> Violation = check log
> 
> Probably just an announcement this is going to
> happen would be enough to 
> stop the bulk of it.
> 
> 73
> Dan
> -- 
> K9ZF /R no budget Rover ***QRP-l #1269 
> Check out the Rover Resource Page at:
> <http://www.qsl.net/n9rla> 
> List Administrator for: InHam+grid-loc+ham-books 
> Ask me how to join the Indiana Ham Mailing list! 
> 
> 
> 
> >   
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> 



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>