VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Limited Roving - Worth the Effort?

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Limited Roving - Worth the Effort?
From: Steve Kavanagh <sjkavanagh1@yahoo.ca>
Reply-to: sjkavanagh1@yahoo.ca
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 05:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
This June's contest provided (at least on Sunday in this area) an outstanding 
example of what can happen when 6m is good.  Practically the only stations to 
be heard on 2m were multi-ops.  Everyone else was on 6m and not paying any 
attention to the other bands, so CQing on 2m was singularly unproductive.  
Since I was running 2 watts to a dipole on 6m, CQing there was also singularly 
unproductive ! 

Other rovers may get bigger scores by using skeds or by using the microwave 
bands (if you are comparing your score with non-limited Rovers) or by meeting 
other rovers at grid corners.

I find that random rover-to-rover QSOs are very rare, even with stations that I 
can work reasonably easily.  I think it is just a question of the low 
probability of the beams being pointed in the right direction at the right time 
on the same band during the brief periods when both rovers are stationary at 
good sites.

73,
Steve VE3SMA/R


      __________________________________________________________________
Connect with friends from any web browser - no download required. Try the new 
Yahoo! Canada Messenger for the Web BETA at 
http://ca.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>