We go through this every single time and I can never get a decent answer to
a question. If you want to pack-rove, what is wrong with being an Unlimited
Rover?
The answer is very simple guys. Unlimited Rover is NOT A PUNISHMENT!!! If
you pack rove, grid circle, or dance around with one foot in different
grids, have at it! I want you to do that. I want you to push your style of
roving to its limits. I want you to experiment and get better each time. I
want you to do this in the category that was created specifically for you
and that is Unlimited Rover.
The ARRL really screwed up when they failed to act on the VUAC's
recommendations on this.
Steve
K4GUN/R
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Jim Forsyth <mail@jimforsyth.com> wrote:
> Well I think the 100Q rover to rover limit is counter productive, I would
> like to see that gone.
>
> I had a great time pack roving in the August and September contests. In
> September we had a pack of nine ten band rovers and visited eleven grids.
> You can see some pictures here: http://www.packrovers.com
>
> Jim, AF6O
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:33 PM
> To: <compmtn@instawave.net>; <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; "frank
> bechdoldt" <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
> Subject: [VHFcontesting] Rover rules and criticisms
>
> > Since I have heard nothing but criticism about the current rover rules on
> > this reflector over the past 2 years or so, I am interested as to how the
> > rover rules should read? Would any of the critics care to elaborate on
> > exactly how the rover rules should be written?
> >
> > 73s John AA5JG
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|