VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] VUAC Survey input/ debate

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] VUAC Survey input/ debate
From: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:25:33 -0800
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
I have reports of :

 

During the contest there were non contestants (formally assisted) spotting non 
assisted people on some of the web pages.  This was not to help the non 
assisted people, but to help the formally assisted people get more QSOS and 
contacts and ultimately QSL cards for working these individuals. In the last 
contest Non assisted qso numbers doubled while the number of registered 
participants dropped because of the loss of  an category.

 

The ARRL can not police the web pages.  Unassisted people benefit from the 
activity of others no matter how they communicate or spot  with each other.  
The current rules has their head in the sand on this issue. The only fair way 
to do it is to acknowledge that all sorts of assistance exists and other than 
exchanging actual QSO information all classes are allowed to spot or be 
spotted.  That or police the web pages and all spotted call signs are 
registered and sent to the ARRL to ensure they are listed as assisted.  A major 
scandal like this happened one with a CQ HF contest where someone documented 
unassisted people were being spotted and the QSO times matched the spots. Why 
expose an ARRL contest to that?

 

k3uhf
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>