VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] WSJT versions for January VHF Contest?

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] WSJT versions for January VHF Contest?
From: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:20:42 -0500
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
On 1/2/2017 10:29 PM, Marshall-K5QE wrote:
<Snip> I have the following problem: The farther we get the meteor operations away from 50.125MHz, the worse the antennas work.

Marshall,

I'm not trying to be argumentative, but I'd like to see some data supporting your statement. A shift of even 200 KHz up from 50.125 is only 0.4%. Are your 6M antennas *REALLY* that narrow in bandwidth?

I have little to no experience on the meteors, so I'll admit that I'm unfamiliar with where the calling frequency is now. But I *DO* know that often up here at least that there are people on non-digital modes above 50.200 in contests. Now that I know that the EME activity is there, I will stay out of its way but not everyone will knoe to, particularly if the band gets crowded.

I know we're talking about 6M here, but on 2M many stations up here are using 144.240 or higher for QSO coordination, particularly for microwaves. So it's not just the calling frequencies which get busy.

It may be stating the obvious, but if you want a segment free of incidental QRM, you're better off higher in the band, not lower.

73, Dave  K8CC


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>