VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Difference between types of Rover?

To: Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Difference between types of Rover?
From: JamesDuffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 13:13:56 -0600
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Sean - One person’s shenanigans are another person’s strategies and tactics. 
Pack roving in  VHF + contesting is one way to address very different levels of 
activity, mostly microwave,  across the USA. You can like it or not, but it is 
not a dishonest activity. 

If the ARRL and others want pack roving eliminated, they should outlaw it 
outright. I understand that may be difficult to do without eliminating roving 
and its advantages entirely. It is clear that the present rules with the 
Unlimited Rover class don’t address the pack roving issue. Few if any pack 
rovers participate as Unlimited Rovers. - Duffey KK6MC

James Duffey KK6MC
Cedar Crest NM

> On Apr 12, 2018, at 12:13, Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Rick K1DS goes pretty well in depth into some of the shenanigans that the 
> rover packs would get into in one of his videos on roving:
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baETPvsxcdI&t=2687s
> 
> When you start to get a little into the history, you can see what specific 
> events triggered the somewhat odd rules here or there. I appreciate that they 
> created the Unlimited class to allow the rules-bending outside-the-box stuff 
> to continue, while protecting the groups that don't want to play those games.
> 
> Sean WA1TE
> 
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:45 PM JamesDuffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Larissa - You asked:
>> “Now, I can see the difference between Limited and Unlimited Rover 
>> categories, but why
>> is there a separate category for Classic Rover? What are the differences?”
>> 
>> The big difference between the Classic Rover class and the Unlimited Rover 
>> class is that the Classic Rover class is limited to 100 QSOes with other 
>> rovers; there is no such limitation in the Unlimited Rover class. The 
>> Unlimited Rover cannot contribute the score earned to a club score. In VHF 
>> contests, the club competition is big, so this is a significant difference. 
>> There are other differences, the Unlimited Rover can have an unlimited 
>> number of operators, the Classic Rover is limited to two operators and 
>> everything that the classic rover uses to make QSOes must be hauled by one 
>> vehicle while in the Unlimited Rover one doesn’t need to haul anything with 
>> the rover at all.
>> 
>> The Unlimited Rover category was instituted to address what many saw as a 
>> problem to VHF contesting and roving, that is pack roving. To what an extent 
>> pack roving was (is?) a significant problem depends on many factors. I won’t 
>> go into that here, but you can get more than a flavor of it by perusing the 
>> archives of this list for the first 7 or 8 years of this century. Among 
>> other things it is an interesting view into psyche of VHF/UHF contesters. 
>> Whatever one’s stance on pack roving, the Unlimited Rover category has had 
>> few, if any, entries from pack rovers over the 10 years of its existence and 
>> in my opinion has failed to gain traction as a class. Not allowing Unlimited 
>> Rovers to contribute to a club score has kept the pack rovers in the Classic 
>> Rover class, and by judicious choice of QSOes with other rovers, large 
>> scores can still be generated by pack rovers in the Classic Rover class even 
>> with the 100 QSO limit. Hence there is no real incentive to go to the 
>> Unlimited Rover class.  
>> 
>> I have operated in all three classes and get the most satisfaction out of 
>> the Classic Rover class, but by operating Limited Rover I am more 
>> competitive nationally and the setup is quick. There is much less 
>> competition operating in the Unlimited Rover class, but I have found that 
>> winning that class in a division where there is only one other entry does 
>> little to sate my competitive appetite.
>> 
>> I hope this answers your question. If not, ask again. - Duffey KK6MC
>> 
>> James Duffey KK6MC
>> Cedar Crest NM
>> 
>> > 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>