I wonder what has changed to cause continued amateur use of the band to
apparently be subject to deletion ?
When I was involved in a project in Canada that looked at using similar
spectrum professionally approx 5 years ago, from my perspective the regulators
in Canada seemed supportive of continued amateur access on a shared basis to at
least some of the band. At the time I thought the increasing commercial use
might have been a good thing for amateurs as relatively low priced broad band
equipment was becoming available. To be transparent I don't have any current
insight into the Canadian plans for this band.
My $.02 worth, the amateur community would be better off looking for smaller
chunks of microwave spectrum that can realistically be shared with other users
(and trying to partner with those spectrum users) rather than trying to fight
for the entire shared allocations we currently have. In my view some
professional users might be more willing to share than others (if only to make
it harder for the spectrum they use to be eventually taken over by other
users.) I realize this may make co ordinated world wide allocations difficult,
but some hard choices may need to be made.
73
Mark S
VE7AFZ
mark@alignedsolutions.com
604 762 4099
> On Nov 25, 2019, at 8:59 AM, Joshua Arritt <jarritt@vt.edu> wrote:
>
> This wasn't a fight for ARRL only -- but ARAs worldwide.
>
> Communications policy and spectrum allocation has been a global community
> matter from day one, respectfully. We must recognize that to not
> mis-charge the term or situation politically. Players left and right --
> globally -- are complicit, because no one wants to be left holding the bag
> that "held up broadband deployment".
>
> Great band, 9cm, and 6cm, 13cm with it. But these are the precise spots
> cellular wants. 23cm is not immune etiher. Dark skies indeed.
>
> Incumbent cm-wave microwave spectrum use -- amateur and traditional
> commercial uses alike -- has never before been so threatened.
>
> Use these bands while you can.
>
> VY 73 DE KF4YLM
>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 9:32 AM Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com> wrote:
>>
>> Anybody who has been paying attention to the impending switch from 4G to 5G
>> cellular technology has known, or at least strongly suspected, this was
>> going to happen. The move to open the 3 GHz band for cellular
>> communications has been ongoing for some time. As a matter of fact, the
>> spectrum from 3.4 to 3.6 GHz has been designated as "globally harmonized".
>> In other words, a world-wide operating band. This spectrum was reallocated
>> in the UK a couple years ago and most ITU Region 1 countries have reserved
>> it for commercial use for many years. The USA is VERY late to the 3 GHZ
>> party. This "harmonization" was discussed and acted upon during WRC2015.
>> Read all about it here:
>>
>> https://www.gsma.com/spectrum/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/3-GHz-in-the-5G-era.pdf
>>
>> The "MOBILE NOW Act", passed in 2017 does not specify ANY frequency bands.
>> It mandates the "making available" ("ripping away from current occupants"
>> in non-Govspeak) of 255 MHz of new spectrum below 6 GHz. One can read a
>> summary of the bill here:
>> https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/19
>>
>> The old satellite C-Band (remember the big old TVRO dishes of the 1970's)
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|