WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[WriteLog] Re: NCJ

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: [WriteLog] Re: NCJ
From: cchrisac0m@cox.net (C.M. Christensen)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 08:44:07 -0500
Alan Clark wrote:
> 
> I talked with Rick Roderick, K5UR, the Delta Division Director, extensively
> about this.  My comments to him, if they were going to take it out of QST,
> start putting it in the NCJ, it would certainly bolster its circulation.  I
> know it is strange this day and time, but there are still a lot of hams that
> do not have access to the internet.  I told him that I was not pleased about
> removing it from QST since it had a larger audience than some of the other
> items in the magazine, but that I would support him whichever way he went.
> I noticed that he voted against taking the items out of QST.
> 
> 73's
> Alan, N5PA
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: writelog-admin@contesting.com
> [mailto:writelog-admin@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Dave L Thompson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 5:38 PM
> To: jljarvis@adelphia.net
> Cc: writelog@contesting.com
> Subject: [WriteLog] Re: NCJ
> 
> The working paper finished July 2, 2002 by K1IR and about 35 hams talks
> about options including NCJ.  What I worry about are the Dx participants
> that cannot get to the ARRL members only web portion.  Jim posted his web
> pages for this material on the cq-contest
> reflector.
> 73 Dave K4JRB
> 
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:29:29 -0400 "jljarvis" <jljarvis@adelphia.net>
> writes:
> >
> > One would hope they'd print the results in NCJ.  It's a
> > better venue.  Besides, it'd give them something to do, besides
> > ego stroking.
> >
> > n2ea
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog

Many of us here in NW Florida have been working against this for some
time but to no avail. It is interesting to note if you read the Minutes
from the BOD meeting that only the vote on removing the Section News was
a recorded vote. The one pertaining to removal of the contest results
from QST was by voice vote approval so we don't have a clue who voted
for that one. 
-- 
73, Chris ACØM

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>