[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Yaesu] FT-1000 vs. FT-1000D

To: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Subject: Re: [Yaesu] FT-1000 vs. FT-1000D
From: k6rb@baymoon.com
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <yaesu@contesting.com">mailto:yaesu@contesting.com>
That is absolutely right. When I first got my 1000D, I thought the sub-RX
was gone because I had the 500 Hz filter selected. You can get a 600 Hz
filter for the sub-RX, but since I have two FT-1000s set up for SO2R, I
rarely use the sub-RX.

Rob K6RB

> Be careful with that sub-receiver.  As a for-instance, if you do not have
> a
> filter installed in the sub-receiver 600-Hz BW position, are listening on
> cw
> with the main receiver and do an A>B, your sub receiver audio will go
> away.
> Press SUB, 2.4K (filter) as a check.
> And the mix/st/mono switch under the top cover could be in the wrong
> position.
> Or the RX MIX control could be full ccw.
> Or the DUAL button could not be enabled.
> All this in a properly operating radio.
> The FT-1000D is a great radio but you do have to take some time to learn
> how
> to use it.
> de Paul, W8AEF
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Ahlbom" <john.ahlbom@gmail.com>
> To: <yaesu@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:05 AM
> Subject: [Yaesu] FT-1000 vs. FT-1000D
>> To W8AEF, Paul,  K5DL, Cecil,  "Pat",  SM6CPI,  Kjell,  K4FX, Bill,
>> K6RB, Rob,  N9WQ, Dave,  thanks for your comments on FT-1000 vs.
>> FT-1000D differences ! I agree, the FT-1000 / D series is a great radio,
>> although I lost subreceiver audio on my FT-1000 and must ship it for
>> rapair !
>> 73, John OH5NZ
> _______________________________________________
> Yaesu mailing list
> Yaesu@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/yaesu

Yaesu mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>