Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] UHF Connectors

To: "jim@audiosystemsgroup.com" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>, "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] UHF Connectors
From: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:02:44 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
  Lots of knowledge has been lost over the past 60 or 70 years. It is important 
to take time
to see where we have been before determine where we are going. 
  I had a coworker that thought his grandfather was not so sharp some of the 
times.
He was telling me about the UHF TV antenna he had on top of a steep hill, the 
house was some
distance way on the side of it. He thought that his feedline instillation was 
rather stupid since 
he did not use coax but a single insulated wire from the tower to the house. 
  I asked him if there was a cone on the ends and he said yes. So I had him 
google 
G-Line and he then realized how sharp he was after all. 
  73
Bill wa4lav

________________________________________
From: Amps [amps-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of Jim Brown 
[jim@audiosystemsgroup.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 2:02 PM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: [Amps] UHF Connectors

On 11/11/2013 10:37 AM, Fuqua, Bill L wrote:
> Isn't "UHF Connector" an oxymoron?

The name dates from the '30s or early '40s.  No question that there's a
small discontinuity due to the Zo of the connector, but it certainly
doesn't matter below 50 MHz, and at higher frequencies is often swamped
by line loss.

Several years ago, I made up a dozen or so lengths of coax for a DX trip
using very low loss cable that I'd bought at a great price, surplus from
a telecom bankruptcy -- construction much like LMR400, except #10 solid
copper for the center, excellent braid/foil shield.  As a test, when I
was finished, I connected them all in series, about 1,200 ft, and
measured with HP generator and HP spectrum analyzer up to about 500 MHz.
I had about 23 83-1SPs and 11 or 12 barrels in line. The loss at 500 MHz
was less than the published spec for the cable. Loss was measured by
substitution (that is, differencing a short direct connection between
generator analyzer with the cable under test) at all of the test
frequencies.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>