RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] ISOBAR

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] ISOBAR
From: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>
Reply-to: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:56:10 -0500 (CDT)
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
the one thing that many people forget is that it is not just the impedance, its 
the distance.  The size of a typical shack, house, and grounding system, is NOT 
small with respect to the wavelengths in play with significant energy, so you 
can't use a simplified impedance to model the protection.  You must take into 
account the rise time vs distance between connections and understand that just 
because you have a ground wire connecting two things they can be at 
significantly different voltages during a lightning stroke.


Sep 18, 2012 10:47:14 AM, svetanoff@earthlink.net wrote:
>Since all of the station equipment is tied (bonded) to
>the one ground system (or should be), the lower the net Z to ground means
>the less voltage developed differentially between grounded connections and
>power feeds, antenna inputs, and so forth. ness of that approach.

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>