Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Short, Fat Vertical

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Short, Fat Vertical
From: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:08:41 EST
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I'm pretty much restricted to a maximum height of 40' for any antenna I  
install on my covenant-restricted lot.  I have thought about an inverted L,  
but I 
also wonder if I can achieve a greater effective height by using  a fatter 
radiating element, primarily using wires that are spread apart.
 
I've seen antennas that use a sharp V configuration or an apex-down  triangle 
to apparently achieve greater bandwidth and perhaps more electrical  height.  
I would imagine that increasing the angle of the apex would  eventually 
create diminishing returns, as ground losses would eventually  increase.
 
Also, what about multiple wires in a tall rectangle shape?  I've seen  some 
references to a three wire folded element in which the center conductor is  
broken and fed, and the spacing is 1 foot between wires.
 
Any thoughts here?  I was thinking of combining this fat vertical  element 
with some type of top loading wire (either an L or a T),  that could also be 
fat 
if that would be advantageous.  I've got a  few trees that would enable me to 
hide this structure, but I can't get too  fancy.
 
I've also thought of a sloper, as I have a mast on the roof peak that is  
about 45' at the top.  The disadvantage here is that the high voltage end  
would 
be close to the ground and could cause some losses.
 
Any thoughts are appreciated!  Paul, K5AF
 
 
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>