Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Best angle of radiation ?

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Best angle of radiation ?
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:23:14 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
AM broadcast band antennas 5/8 & 1/2 wave tall are rarely used any more. I noticed a reduction of the tall AM towers starting about the 1960's.

An optimized half-wave design (180-195 electrical degrees) is still the height of choice for AM broadcasters. There are many factors, including financial, land acquisition, etc.- that preclude the use of these optimized radiators, but given the choice, an optimized half-wave design is preferred.

Yesterday, I pointed out that these half-wave designs were preferred since they simultaneously maximize gain at zero elevation while minimizing skywave radiation. It would have been more correct to state that the optimized half-wave design maximizes gain at zero elevation while simultaneously minimizing *high-angle lobes* that are associated with radiators over about 195 degrees in height and that includes the 5/8 wave radiator (225 electrical degrees). It's the high-angle skywave component that's destructive to AMBC listening.

Paul, W9AC
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>