Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: dipole height

To: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>, "'topband'" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: dipole height
From: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:40:45 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I believe the original query was about transmitting effectiveness which is where the 15M and 60M heights of the original poster were suggested.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
To: "'topband'" <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: dipole height


RDF is the key point to improve signal noise, not gain. Vertical or low
dipole has very or none directivity, so low RDF or directivity does not
improve signal noise.

In general, this is the case, but it is not always true.

Since I started using RDF, let me explain what it really is.

RDF is really just directivity. I used RDF so people would stop using gain, because gain has little value for receiving. For example, if I place two Beverages side-by-side 1/4 wave apart there is almost no pattern change. Gain increases 3 dB, but certainly not receiving ability!!!

As long as the noise is evenly distributed in all directions, or if dominate noise would be randomly distributed in all directions at different times, RDF works great as a guideline.

If dominant noise comes from the SAME direction and polarization as the desired signal, nothing will help. Anything that nulls the noise also nulls the signal.

If dominant noise comes from a null direction, the difference between gain in the desired signal direction to null of the noise will set the performance. For example, with a thunderstorm off the rear, F/R is most important.

If noise is unevenly distributed, then it becomes very complex.

Most people out in a rural area are probably in a situation where whatever QRM or noise bothers them, comes from random, differing, directions. Some people in congested areas have significant noise from one direction, and they need a deeper null in that specific direction. Going for exceptionally high F/R is meaningless unless there is somewhat-consistent strong QRM from the rear.
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5363 - Release Date: 10/30/12


_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>