Correct, but if he doesn’t, its actually the primary responsibility of the
control operator/station owner to shut down the station to prevent further
illegal transmissions.
Ed N1UR
From: Louis Parascondola [mailto:gudguyham@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 1:53 AM
To: sawyered@earthlink.net; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
It is the same thing as if he was here physically, he must use his call with a
/ w2 or whatever.
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net>
To: topband <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, Jan 14, 2016 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
In the case discussed of a station remoting in and not properly identifying
(ie an Italian station remoting a USA station but continuing to use the
Italian callsign), it seems to me that the FCC would consider the station
owner the control operator and therefore responsible for the proper IDing of
transmissions made from their station.
I would think a few fines issued by the FCC to the remote station holder,
would shut these games down in a hurry. I wonder if the RHR station owners
that are being leased out by individuals realize their liability in these
circumstances. I think some people will be shocked with a certified letter
at some point and the game will quickly change.
Ed N1UR
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|