Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside

Subject: Re: Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? (long)
From: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:20:01 -0400
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Mixed, as per one of the definitions: containing a mixture of both
favorable and negative elements.

FT8 belongs in it, it's a favorable element. LOL

73 de Vince, VA3VF

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net> wrote:

> Hi Dale,
>
> My comments were more aimed at the "let's separate FT/JT modes into their
> own separate DXCC category and disqualify them from Mixed" sentiment. I
> have no problem with the per mode style DXCC awards. I just wanted to point
> out that someone can't retroactively change the definition of Mixed because
> they don't like a specific mode being in there. I guess I wasn't as clear
> as I could have been in my phrasing.
>
> 73,
> Nick K1NZ
>
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>