Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: WB6RSE Flag type loop question

To: "'Carl Luetzelschwab'" <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>, "'Joe Subich, W4TV'" <lists@subich.com>, "'topBand List'" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: WB6RSE Flag type loop question
From: David Cutter via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: David Cutter <d.cutter@ntlworld.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 11:32:10 +0100
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I am at a loss to know how to model it with any confidence, for wires close
to or  on the ground.
David G3UNA

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Carl
Luetzelschwab
Sent: 01 August 2018 23:02
To: Joe Subich, W4TV; topBand List
Subject: Re: Topband: WB6RSE Flag type loop question

Joe,

> However, the Waller Flag is a dual loop that trades off signal for 
> pattern.

I agree. But I believe it's gain is very low mostly because it's made up of
electrically very small loops.

A very small loop has its main lobes in the plane of the loop - not
perpendicular to the plane of the loop as in a quarter-wave-on-a-side loop
in a Quad antenna. When a very small loop is mounted horizontally, there's a
null in the pattern towards the ground. So even though it's mounted
horizontally, it is less susceptible to the effects of the ground.

> The LOG is a horizontally polarized antenna nearly on the "boundary"
> where the horizontally polarized signal goes to zero.  The better the 
> ground (higher conductivity), the worse (lower) the signal level from 
> the LOG  (thank you Dr. Maxwell).

I also agree with Dr. Maxwell. But a very small loop mounted horizontally is
not like a big antenna mounted horizontally.

And Nick is correct - KK5JY shows a two-loop system farther on down - it's
kind of approaching a horizontal Waller Flag.

Carl K9LA
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>