Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary

To: Dan Edward Dba East edwards <dan.n.edwards@sbcglobal.net>, topband@contesting.com, Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 10:37:15 -0800
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
An additional wrinkle concerning a remote RX site at
a distance within 100 km:  I used to have such a
setup.  The non obvious advantage of it is that it
allows for FULL DUPLEX operation ON THE SAME FREQUENCY.
This is like QSK on steroids.
Depending on the circumstances, this can be a huge
advantage.  Just this morning, I lost a QSO with an
A3 station because I kept doubling with him.
If necessary, the remote RX could have
a optional loop oriented so as to null the TX site.

This is a fundamental difference vs a complete station
at a remote location.  (Someone asked "what is the
difference?")

I just wanted to point out that distinction.

I suppose there could be an unenforceable rule requiring
a TX lockout to prevent full duplex.

Rick N6RK

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>