| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data) |
| From: | Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:34:07 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Your "apparent" and mine are different because it isn't apparent to me that I
advocated that. I offered a possible explanation to what Todd is observing and
provided the title of a reference source where he could explore it more fully. I
mentioned what I am using and my rational for doing so.
Wes N7WS On 1/22/2019 3:12 PM, Mike Smith VE9AA wrote: So, now we're (apparently) recommending he cut back his already minimal radial field..uhhh, really Wes? _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data), Mike Waters |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Topband]Updated K9YC common-mode choke PDF now available, john@kk9a.com |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data), Mike Waters |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data), Todd Goins |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |