Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Cushcraft baluns / lousy customer service

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft baluns / lousy customer service
From: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom)
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 14:39:45 -0500
>
> Hello Ed,
> Several years ago, on the basis of your article, I threw away all my
> BN-86s which were constantly giving trouble and retired the W2DU baluns
> that had generally worked OK, but were getting a little old.  The TVI
> and telephone interference that had led me to use baluns in the first
> place were just as "gone" with the coax chokes as they were with the
> troublesome commercial jobs.  That was all the proof that I needed.

Right on. I use coax choke baluns for everything, and don't worry at all
about cold flow or anything else. I use RG-6 CATV cable,  RG-8X, or PTFE
coax (with a UV resistant jacket) where weight is a problem, and other
lines for extreme power.     

Like you and Roy Lewallen, I have measured the baluns and tested them for
performance AND life. I've been using them for 25 years or longer and have
NEVER had a balun failure. Just don't exceed the bending radius rating of
the coax, or overheat it, and it will last the life of any coax in the same
environment. 
 
> However, I'm not sure that your coax chokes would effectively replace
> balums or baloons. :-)

I just knew that was remark was coming!! ;-)

Tom

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>