I can kind of the point of the first guy (whoever that is). The report is
inexpensive, but hearing about it over and over could get old.
Actually, it isn't that bad. You could be on the logger list where they're
always talking about how you shouldn't ask when the new version is going
to be out. Or getting jumped on for saying it isn't the best logging
program since it is, after all, free.
I'd buy the report myself if it had quads. (We all have our problems,
right?) :)
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Peter Larsen wrote:
> >as a sales pitch instead of real info.....
>
> Have you read the report? It is quite inexpensive. I have read it and
> passed it on to other guys. Well worth the cost if you want to see how
> they did their tests and get the results.
>
> I don't think this is a sales pitch as much as a pointer to where to get
> the best "real info" around.
>
> Now if Ward and Steve would just do the Gem Quads, and Lightning Bolt
> quads I would be happy.
--
Hisashi T Fujinaka - htodd@twofifty.com
BSEE (6/86) + BSChem (3/95) + BAEnglish (8/95) + $2.50 = mocha latte
|