[TowerTalk] Re: One more ground radial question

[Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>]

Is something like this ever confirmed by field
strenght measurements?

73 Jim SM2EKM
--------------------------------------------------

Don Havlicek wrote:
> Yes!
> In my case ... 60 radials spaced 6 degrees apart .. then concentrations 
> of ten radials at 1 degree each for Europe, Japan, South America, and 
> VK/ZL ... works like gangbusters .. all I need now is to clean out the 
> shack and put a new feedline out to the vertical again!
> Don
> N8DE
>
> va3pl@cuic.ca wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Havlicek" <n8de@thepoint.net>
> > To: <kb9cry@comcast.net>
> > Cc: <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:12 PM
> > Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] One more ground radial question
> >
> >
> >
> > > I believe the word "optimum" should be replaced with "sufficient".
> > > My experience with verticals tells me that 100 radials works much 
> > > better than 60, especially when concentrated in certain directions.
,


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk