Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna
From: "John Wagner" <jwagner@dxengineering.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:54:38 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
The Receive Four Square using active antennas is also worth looking at.
www.dxengineering.com

73, John W8JJW
> 
> Many thanks to all who replied both on the list and privately.
> 
> Several suggested a low dipole as an alternative. That 
> antenna I already have and whilst it does work well it is 
> more or less omni-directional. It is also pretty high angle, 
> and my closest population centre (Toronto) is some 400km 
> south of me and full of zero pointers!
> Nevertheless, there are certainly times when the low dipole 
> is by far the best receive antenna on DX signals. 
> 
> It seems to me that a directional antenna should give me a 
> 3dB (or so) improvement in s/n, and so I have discounted 
> antennas such as loops, which while they may give some 
> improvement on local noise have a pattern much like a dipole.
> 
> I am not bothered by local noise on the receive antennas as 
> they are several thousand feet from any houses or power 
> lines, but of course atmospheric noise can come from all over.
> 
> Andrei, RA6LBS, said that he can switch his Beverages between 
> 1000' and 500' and notices a dramatic difference between the 
> two settings. I have used short Beverages in the past and 
> found them pretty good, so I think I will go that way, 
> particularly as it is the easiest thing to do. (I can switch 
> between different remote receive antennas and have a spare 
> position so all that is necessary is a matching transformer, 
> some wire and a termination.)
> 
> Thanks again for the input.
> 
> 73 Roger
> VE3ZI


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>