Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] MOVs in Stackmatch

To: TOWERTALK@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MOVs in Stackmatch
From: Jeff Carter <towertalk@hidden-valley.com>
Reply-to: towertalk@hidden-valley.com
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:18:11 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
That's exactly right.  They're essentially semiconductors, and their
use as snubbers or clamps bear that out.

Like all semiconductors, they're affected by heat.  Since they work by
converting the over-power situation to heat, in effect they kill
themselves slowly with every event.

Citations for this data appear below, in case anybody cares to look at
the original data.

Jeff/KD4RBG

Source: Simple Model of Metal Oxide Varistor for Pspice Simulation,
IEEE Official Publication
URL : http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1336959

---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:05:16 EDT
>From: TexasRF@aol.com
>Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MOVs in Stackmatch
>To: kkidd@kkbc.com,TOWERTALK@contesting.com
>
>
>I was under the impression that MOV devices are "damaged" somewhat during
>each protection event and eventually enough "damage" accumulates and they
>have  to be replaced.
>
>Maybe someone with more knowledge will comment on that.
>
>If this is the case, it seems that a big hit might use up a lot of the
>reserve.
>
>73,
>Gerald K5GW
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>